Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of the advantages and disadvantages of different phosphate binders

From: Considerations about the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of therapies in the treatment of hyperphosphataemia

Phosphate binder

Advantages

Disadvantages (limiting factors)

Calcium acetate

(e. g. Calcium acetate Nefro®, Calcium acetate Prorenal AM®, Phos-Ex®, amongst others)

• Effectiveness independent of pH value

• Lower calcium uptake compared to calcium carbonate

• Moderate tablet burden

• Highly cost-effective

• Good tolerability

• Gastrointestinal complaints

• Risk of hypercalcaemia

• In some circumstances, influence on vascular calcification

Calcium carbonate

(e. g. CC-Nefro®, Dreisacarb®, Calci-Gry®, amongst others)

• Effective

• Highly cost-effective

• Good tolerability

• Effectiveness influenced by pH value

• Gastrointestinal complaints

• Risk of hypercalcaemia

• In some circumstances, influence on vascular calcification

Aluminum salts

(e. g. Phosphonorm®)

• High effectiveness independent of pH value

• Highly cost-effective

• High risk of aluminum toxication including encephalopathy and bone diseases

• Difficulties in relation to precise dosing

• Greater amount of controls

Sevelamer

(Renagel®, Renvela®)

• Effective

• No risk of hypercalcaemia

• Amongst other things, preventative action in relation to calcification and cholesterol

• Frequent gastrointestinal complaints

• High costs

• High tablet burden, poor compliance

• In some circumstances, negative influence on other medication (e.g. binding of fat-soluble vitamins)

Lanthanum carbonate

(Fosrenol®)

• Effectiveness independent of pH value

• No risk of hypercalcaemia

• Low dosage - low tablet burden, improved compliance

• High costs

• In some circumstances, lanthanum particles can be reabsorbed from the intestine and reach the organs

Combination preparation

(OsvaRen®)

• Effectiveness independent of pH value

• Lower calcium uptake and reduced risk of hypercalcaemia compared to calcium acetate and calcium carbonate

• Good tolerability

• Moderate tablet burden

• Moderate costs

• In some circumstances, preventative effect in relation to calcification

• Monitoring of the magnesium level

• In some circumstances, moderate increase in the serum magnesium level