Skip to main content

Table 1 Study characteristics

From: Costing of physical activity programmes in primary prevention: a review of the literature

Type of econ. analysis

Author (year of publication)

Type of physical exercise intervention

Length of intervention (data collection)

Comparator

Health Outcome

Number of participants (sex), age (years)

Country, setting, study design

CUA

Chen et al. (2008) [34]

Walking

12 weeks (baseline-12 weeks)

no intervention

QALY

98 (m/f),

> 65

Taiwan, community, RCT

 

Munro et al. (2004) [23]

Free exercise classes by qualified exercise leader

2 years (baseline-1 year - 2 years)

usual care

Mortality, health status, QALY

6,420 (m/f),

> 65

UK, community, Cluster RCT

CEA

Elley et al. (2004) [20]

Green prescription: verbal and written exercise advice by GP and telephone exercise specialist

1 year (baseline-1 year)

usual care

Total energy expended (change in PA), QALY

878 (m/f), 40-79

New Zealand, GPP, Cluster RCT

 

Stevens et al. (1998) [22]

Individual PA by exercise development officer

10 weeks (baseline-10 weeks- 8 months)

EI vs MI

PA, number of sedentary people

714 (m/f), 45-74

UK, GPP, RCT

 

Robertson et al. (2001a) [27]

Individually home-based PA by district nurse

1 year (baseline-1 year)

usual care

Falls and injuries

240 (m/f),

≥ 75

New Zealand, GPP, RCT

 

Robertson et al. (2001b) [26]

Individually home-based PA by general practice nurse

1 year (baseline-1 year)

usual care

Falls and injuries

450 (m/f),

≥ 80

New Zealand, GPP, CT

 

Robertson et al. (2001c) [25]

Individually home-based PA by physiotherapist

2 years (baseline-2 years)

usual care

Falls and injuries

233 (f),

≥ 80

New Zealand, GPP/home, RCT

 

Proper et al. (2004) [21]

Worksite PA counselling

9 months (baseline-9 months)

EI vs MI

Sick leave, PA, cardiovascular fitness

299 (m/f), 44

Netherlands, municipal services, RCT

 

Shephard (1992) [35]

Employee fitness programme

12 years (6 months- 18 months- 7 years-10 years-12 years)

no intervention

PA, absenteeism; corporate commitment

534 (m/f), age n.s.

Canada, company, CT

 

Sevick et al. (2000) [36]

Structured exercise intervention and supervised behavioural skills training

2 years (baseline-6 months-2 years)

no intervention

Energy expenditure (kcal/gk/day), peak flow (VO2 in ml/kg/min); PA; heart rate, blood pressure, weight

235(m/f), 35-60

USA, company, RCT

 

Finkelstein et al. (2002) [24]

WISEWOMAN project: screening and counselling

1 year (baseline-1 year)

MI vs EI

Risk of CHD, LYG

1586 (f), 40-64

USA, community/healthcare sites, RCT

 

Dzator et al. (2004) [19]

Self-directed intervention of PA and nutrition delivered by mail (low level) or by mail and group sessions (high level)

16 weeks (baseline-16 weeks-1 year)

no intervention

BMI, Total/HDL cholesterol, blood pressure, PA (W/kg), nutrition fat intake

137 (m/f) couples, all ages

Australia, home, RCT

 

The Writing Group (2001) [43]

PA counselling with current recommended care

2 years (baseline- 6 months- 1 year -18 months - 2 years)

usual care

Cardio-respiratory fitness, self-reported PA

874 (m/f), 35-75

USA, GPP, RCT

other Econ. Analysis

Ackermann et al. (2003) [33]

Group-based exercise community programme

20.7 months (baseline-20,7 months)

no intervention

Endurance, strength, balance, flexibility

4,456 (m/f)

≥ 65

USA, community, Retro MCT

 

Ackermann et al. (2008) [28]

Group-based PA programme

2 years (baseline-1 year-2 years)

no intervention

Comorbidity (RxRisk-score, lipo-protein, cholesterol, triglycerides, haemoglobin, DM, CAD, arthritis)

1,188 (m/f),

≥ 65

USA, community, Retro MCT

 

Baun et al. (1986) [32]

Unsupervised and supervised health and fitness activities

1 year (baseline-1 year)

no intervention

Absenteeism rates

517 (m/f),

≥ 55

USA, company, RCT

 

Shephard (1982) [31]

Employee fitness and lifestyle programme

9 months (baseline-1 year-2 years)

no intervention

-

534 (m/f), 21- < 90

Canada, company, CT

 

Shephard et al. (1983) [30]

Employee fitness programme

9 months (baseline-9 months)

no intervention

Fitness, HHA- score

326 (m/f), 30.5-37.9 (mean)

Canada, company, RCT

  1. Abbreviations: CAD: cardiocascular disease; CEA: cost-effectiveness analysis; CT: controlled trial; CUA: cost-utility analysis; DM: Diabetes Mellitus; Econ.: economic; EI: enhanced intervention; f: female; GP: general practitioner; GPP: general practitioner practices; m: male; MCT: matched controlled trial; MI: minimum intervention; n.s.: not stated; PA: physical activity; RCT: randomised controlled trial; Retro: retrospective; UK: United Kingdom; USA: United States of America.