Skip to main content

Table 7 Second stage estimation results from censored and truncated regression

From: Efficiency of primary care in rural Burkina Faso. A two-stage DEA analysis

 

Censored

Truncated

 

Coefficient

p value

Coefficient

p value r

Distance

0.107***

(0.001)

0.114***

(0.001)

AnInd

0.001

(0.969)

0.001

(0.763)

AnHH

-0.001***

(0.000)

-0.001*

(0.008)

AnHHead

-0.017*

(0.000)

-0.013**

(0.016)

GoodInd

0.001

(0.510)

-0.003

(0.469)

GoodHH

0.032**

(0.000)

0.096**

(0.001)

GoodHHead

-0.001*

(0.000)

-0.001**

(0.001)

EBwa

-0.014

(0.313)

-0.064**

(0.004)

EDaf

-0.047***

(0.000)

-0.115***

(0.000)

EPlh

-0.038*

(0.016)

-0.251***

(0.002)

ESam

0.192***

(0.000)

0.083***

(0.000)

Rani

0.076**

(0.001)

0.174***

(0.000)

Rcat

-0.107***

(0.000)

-0.169***

(0.000)

Rmus

0.209***

(0.000)

0.218***

(0.000)

Constant

0.180***

(0.000)

0.373***

(0.038)

Sigma

0.296***

(0.003)

0.273***

(0.000)

Log Likelihood

-2823.7959

 

1564.8673

 

Wald

122.43

(0.000)

869.53

(0.000)

  1. Note: The table presents estimates using a Tobit and three specifications of the bootstrap censored based methodology. The dependent variable is DEA score based on the CCR technology with four input and four output variables. The superscripts: *, **, and *** denote significance at the 10%, 5% and 1% levels, respectively.
Back to article page

Health Economics Review

ISSN: 2191-1991

Contact us