Table 8 Second stage estimation results from bootstrap truncated regression
From: Efficiency of primary care in rural Burkina Faso. A two-stage DEA analysis
| Â | Model I | Model II | Model III | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | Â | 95% Confidence interval | Â | 95% Confidence interval | Â | 95% Confidence interval | |||
| Â | Coefficient | Lower | Upper | Coefficient | Lower | Upper | Coefficient | Lower | Upper |
Distance | 0.135*** | 0.117 | 0154 | 0.137*** | 0.119 | 0.155 | 0.146*** | 0.126 | 0.166 |
AnInd | 3.52e -08 | -2,50e-08 | 9.55e-08 | 3.53e-0.8 | -2.54-08 | 9.59-08 | -4.89e-08 | -1.11e-07 | 1.33e-08 |
AnHH | -7.95e-08 | -9.42e-08 | -6.47e-08 | -7.93e-08 | -9.42e08 | -6.45e | - | - | - |
AnHHead | -0.006** | -0.001 | -0.000 | -0.001* | -0.001 | -0.000 | -0.001** | -0.001 | -0.0000 |
GoodInd | -0.001 | -2.76e-08 | 2.33e-08 | -0.000 | -2.84e-08 | 2.41-08 | 1.08e-08 | -1.82e-08 | 3.97e-08 |
GoodHH | 0.125** | 0.097 | 0.153 | 0.000** | 9.74e-09 | 1.54e-08 | - | - | - |
GoodHHead | -0.005*** | -0.005 | -0.004 | -0.005*** | -0.005 | -0.004 | -0.0005*** | -0.001 | -0.004 |
EBwa | -0.064* | -0.115 | -0.014 | -0.041 | -0.006 | -0.870 | -0.530 | -0.107 | 0.001 |
EDaf | -0.115*** | -0.144 | -0.086 | - | - | - | -0.105*** | -0.136 | -0.742 |
Emos | - | - | - | 0.104*** | 0.731 | 0.134 | - | - | - |
EPlh | -0.251*** | -0.310 | -0.193 | -0.145*** | -0.202 | -0.870 | -0.350*** | -0.415 | -0.285 |
ESam | 0.083*** | 0.055 | 0.110 | 0.186*** | 0.164 | 0.216 | 0.105*** | 0.077 | 0.133 |
RAni | 0.174*** | 0.239 | 0.324 | -0.345 | -0.457 | -0.233 | 0.182 | 0.024 | 0.34 |
RCat | -0.169 | -0.271 | -0.674 | - | - | - | -0.201 | -0.311 | -0.091 |
RMus | 0.218*** | 0.122 | 0.313 | 0.472** | 0.0146 | 0.798 | 0.257*** | 0.151 | 0.363 |
RPrt | - | - | - | 0.166** | 0.271 | 0.606 | - | - | - |
Constant | 0.372*** | 0.274 | 0.471 | 0.439 | 0.397 | 0.481 | 0.320 | 0.208 | 0.431 |
Sigma | 0.276*** | 0.264 | 0.288 | 0.277*** | 0.264 | 0.289 | 0.288*** | 0.275 | 0.302 |