Skip to main content

Table 7 Comparison of residents’ knowledge, attitudes, and preferences regarding their neighborhood community health station

From: Contracting with private providers for primary care services: evidence from urban China

Socioeconomic variables (%)

Respondents

Respondents who visited the facility

All (n=1013)

Pub-C (n=445)

Pri-C (n=568)

Pri-Pub Difference

All (n=681)

Pub-C (n=299)

Pri-C (n=382)

Pri-Pub Difference

Know the name or address of the neighborhood CHS

No

35.3

37.8

33.5

−4.30

21.1

23.4

19.4

−4.04

Yes

64.7

62.2

66.5

4.30

78.9

76.6

80.6

4.04

At least one family member visited this CHS before

No

26.6

27.9

25.5

−2.34

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.00

Yes

67.2

67.2

67.3

0.06

100.0

100.0

100.0

0.00

Not sure/Forgot

5.7

4.9

6.3

1.39

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.00

Willing to do routine examination at this CHS

No

26.7

31.9

22.5

−9.37***

16.6

21.1

13.1

−7.98***

Yes

49.0

42.2

54.2

11.98***

65.5

58.5

70.9

12.41***

Not sure

22.6

25.6

20.2

−5.37*

17.5

20.4

15.2

−5.22*

First visit this CHS when sick

No

24.9

30.8

20.2

−10.54***

12.2

17.1

8.4

−8.68***

Yes

52.0

47.2

55.8

8.62***

69.8

64.5

73.8

9.27***

Not sure

21.6

21.8

21.5

−0.32

18.1

18.4

17.8

−0.59

Received advertising materials from this CHS

Yes

46.1

41.3

49.8

8.48***

56.5

53.2

59.2

5.99

No

34.6

40.0

30.3

−9.72***

29.8

35.1

25.7

−9.46***

Not sure

17.9

18.4

17.4

−1.00

13.7

11.7

15.2

3.48

Can call responsible doctors at any time when needed

Yes

42.8

40.7

44.5

3.87

54.5

52.8

55.8

2.92

No

10.1

9.2

10.7

1.53

9.5

8.4

10.5

2.11

Not sure

45.3

49.7

41.9

−7.76**

35.8

38.5

33.8

−4.69

Do providers at this CHS know the health status of your family members?

Very well

5.6

5.6

5.6

0.02

7.3

7.7

7.1

−0.62

Yes

32.1

31.9

32.2

0.31

42.7

41.8

43.5

1.65

No

38.4

36.9

39.6

2.76

28.8

26.1

30.9

4.80

Not sure

22.2

25.4

19.7

−5.67*

21.1

24.4

18.6

−5.83*

  1. Notes: 1) Pub-C refers to a catchment area served by a public (government-owned) CHS; Pri-C refers to a catchment area served by a private CHS; 2) * New Cooperative Medical System; 3) ***, **, * refer to 1%, 5% and 10% statistical significance level, respectively; here we report proportion test (‘prtest’ in Stata) results (P-values) for public-private differences, rather than mean (‘ttest’ in Stata) because the ttest command relies on some distributional assumptions that may not be true for each component; 4) the summation for each category may not equal 100% because of missing values.