Skip to main content

Table 1 Acceptance of methodology of indirect comparisons by IQWiG, HAS, NICE and SMC within benefit assessments

From: Relevance of indirect comparisons in the German early benefit assessment and in comparison to HTA processes in England, France and Scotland

Methodology of indirect comparison

Explanation

Acceptance by

IQWiG

HAS

NICE

SMC

Unadjusted

•Naïve use of single study arms of different trials (violation of randomization)

−

−

−

/

•Application of matching procedures and multivariate analysis

Adjusted

•Meta-analytical summary of RCT outcomes

+

+

+

/

•Subtraction of realized therapeutic effects (control group vs. verum group(s))

•Comparison of adjusted verum groups

MTC

•Combination of evidence from direct and indirect comparisons

−

+

+

/

•Basic assumptions of adjusted indirect comparison are applied

•Efficacy ranking of examined therapies

•Bayesian and frequentist approach

  1. +: yes, −: no, /: unknown.
  2. Sources: [7],[17],[18].