Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 6 Estimation of the latent class logit model – 4 classes

From: Heterogeneity in general practitioners’ preferences for quality improvement programs: a choice experiment and policy simulation in France

  Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Class 4
  Coefficient t-Stat Coefficient t-Stat Coefficient t-Stat Coefficient t-Stat
Level of remuneration -0.0001 (-1.56) 0.0002*** (7.35) 0.0023*** (19.04) -0.0030*** (-18.85)
Forfait -0.2202 (-0.35) -0.8085* (-2.07) -9.6873*** (-14.26) -26.8455*** (-18.89)
Pay-for-performance -1.5179 (-1.94) 0.6209 (1.71) -24.0380*** (-29.94) -20.2301*** (-15.56)
Frequency -0.5197 (-0.84) 0.9612** (2.70) 1.2295* (2.31) 34.5608*** (34.54)
Definition of guidelines 1.8732 (1.76) -0.1382 (-0.41) -3.8807*** (-6.19) 46.0073*** (27.24)
Application of guidelines 2.0941 (1.79) 0.5921 (1.70) -14.4822*** (-22.98) 17.9852*** (19.47)
Continuing education 3.6665*** (4.51) -1.0573** (-3.13) 11.0212*** (14.31) -6.5797*** (-5.23)
Information feedback -0.6791 (-1.29) 0.1495 (0.37) 7.4359*** (8.38) -4.5607*** (-4.39)
Solo practice -1.2745 (-1.63) 1.0318*** (3.44) -3.9727*** (-7.85) -8.1784*** (-9.51)
Assistance by NPP -1.3672* (-2.32) 0.4714 (1.88) -11.7878*** (-17.33) 40.3411*** (36.88)
ASC 2.8629 (0.54) 2.7353 (1.00) -67.6568 (.) 72.4956 (.)
Average class share 0.136   0.317   0.231   0.316  
Number of observations 3390        
Number of respondents 303        
Log Likelihood -844.7561        
AIC 1779.5122        
BIC 2055.2985        
  1. *Significant at 5 %; **significant at 1 %; ***significant at 0.1 %