Heterogeneity in general practitioners’ preferences for quality improvement programs: a choice experiment and policy simulation in France

Table 8 CAPI and alternative QIPs

	CAPI	Integrated primary care model (P1)	Mixed remuneration (P2)	Non-financial interventions (P3)	Maximum satisfaction (P4)
Level of remuneration	4200	4200	4200	0	4200
Method of remuneration	Forfait and P4P	Forfait	Forfait and FFS	No	Forfait and FFS
Frequency of remuneration	Annual	Annual	Annual	No	NA
Prevention clinical guidelines	No	Pre-established	No	Participatory	Participatory
Continuing education in prevention	No	Yes	No	Yes	Yes
Feedback on preventive practices	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes
Group practice	No	Yes	No	No	No
Assistance by non-physician providers	No	Yes	No	No	NA

In the last column, the frequency of remuneration and assistance by NPP are not considered because GPs are indifferent to it at the mean. The maximum satisfaction is defined for all GPs. The French forfait are paid annually per patient (P1). FFS means a payment at each visit and cannot be “monthly” or “annual”, but mixed remuneration here includes a forfait, so we select the annual frequency for P2

ISSN: 2191-1991