Skip to main content

Table 9 Policy simulation: compensating variation (Euro per year)

From: Heterogeneity in general practitioners’ preferences for quality improvement programs: a choice experiment and policy simulation in France

   CAPI Integrated primary care model Mixed remuneration Non-financial interventions Maximum satisfaction
All GPs Indirect utility -0.5143 0.8974 0.1594 1.9093 3.5391
  CV x 9113 4349 15646 26167
P4P “inclined” Indirect utility 0.1824 1.0987 -0.7463 2.1993 3.1624
  CV x 5915 -5995 13020 19238
P4P “adverse” Indirect utility -0,7121 0,8542 0,4087 1,8295 3,6504
  CV x 10112 7236 16408 28163
Assistance by NPP “inclined” Indirect utility -0.7463 1.4502 -0.6057 1.6088 3.0452
  CV x 14180 908 15204 24477
Assistance by NPP “adverse” Indirect utility -0.3814 0.2714 1.1420 2.1565 4.1030
  CV x 4214 9835 16384 28951
Class 1 Indirect utility -1.9848 2.6139 -1.9848 5.0337 5.3483
  CV x 61397 0 93705 97905
Class 2 Indirect utility 2.0676 -2.9193 2.0676 -0.0255 0.9140
  CV x -22293 0 -9357 -5157
Class 3 Indirect utility 7,0764 -5,0059 49,9679 22,3915 65,8679
  CV x -5204 18474 6596 25323
Class 4 Indirect utility -152.8812 6.3605 -76.4541 -13.6526 45.8256
  CV x 53925 25881 47148 67290