Skip to main content

Table 9 Policy simulation: compensating variation (Euro per year)

From: Heterogeneity in general practitioners’ preferences for quality improvement programs: a choice experiment and policy simulation in France

  

CAPI

Integrated primary care model

Mixed remuneration

Non-financial interventions

Maximum satisfaction

All GPs

Indirect utility

-0.5143

0.8974

0.1594

1.9093

3.5391

 

CV

x

9113

4349

15646

26167

P4P “inclined”

Indirect utility

0.1824

1.0987

-0.7463

2.1993

3.1624

 

CV

x

5915

-5995

13020

19238

P4P “adverse”

Indirect utility

-0,7121

0,8542

0,4087

1,8295

3,6504

 

CV

x

10112

7236

16408

28163

Assistance by NPP “inclined”

Indirect utility

-0.7463

1.4502

-0.6057

1.6088

3.0452

 

CV

x

14180

908

15204

24477

Assistance by NPP “adverse”

Indirect utility

-0.3814

0.2714

1.1420

2.1565

4.1030

 

CV

x

4214

9835

16384

28951

Class 1

Indirect utility

-1.9848

2.6139

-1.9848

5.0337

5.3483

 

CV

x

61397

0

93705

97905

Class 2

Indirect utility

2.0676

-2.9193

2.0676

-0.0255

0.9140

 

CV

x

-22293

0

-9357

-5157

Class 3

Indirect utility

7,0764

-5,0059

49,9679

22,3915

65,8679

 

CV

x

-5204

18474

6596

25323

Class 4

Indirect utility

-152.8812

6.3605

-76.4541

-13.6526

45.8256

 

CV

x

53925

25881

47148

67290