Table 3 Factors associated with community groups’ perception of healthcare quality (n = 52)
Independent variables | Univariate | Multivariate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Coef. | (95 % CI) | Coef. | (95 % CI) | |
Model 1: Group type | ||||
Religious | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
Traders | −0.91 | (−2.31 0.50) | ||
Widows | −0.59 | (−3.47 2.30) | ||
CVG | 2.03 | (−0.66 4.72) | ||
Music/singers | −0.11 | (−2.22 2.00) | ||
Artisans | 1.78* | (−0.16 3.72) | ||
Youth associations | −0.73 | (−2.00 0.55) | ||
LR chi2(6) | 9.27 | |||
Prob > chi2 | 0.1591 | |||
Pseudo R2 | 0.0267 | |||
Model 2: Gender distribution | ||||
Equal gender distribution | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
All male groups | 1.86 | (−0.77 4.49) | ||
All female groups | 0.92 | (−1.41 3.25) | ||
Male dominated groups | 0.61 | (−1.53 2.75) | ||
Female dominated groups | 0.16 | (−3.29 3.62) | ||
LR chi2(6) | 2.83 | |||
Prob > chi2 | 0.5872 | |||
Pseudo R2 | 0.0082 | |||
Model 3: Literacy/education | ||||
Literates/illiterates | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
Mainly literates | −0.46 | (−1.97 1.06) | ||
Mainly illiterates | 0.192 | (−1.07 1.46) | ||
LR chi2(6) | 1.10 | |||
Prob > chi2 | 0.5777 | |||
Pseudo R2 | 0.0032 | |||
Model 4: Group meetings dynamics | ||||
Active membership | 0.01 | (−0.02 0.05) | ||
Engagement duration | 0.02 | (−0.02 0.06) | ||
Average time per discussant | −0.30 | (−0.93 0.34) | ||
Age distribution | ||||
Youthful (18–30 years) | Ref | Ref | ||
Elderly (31+ years) | 0.98* | (−0.10 2.06) | ||
Geographic location | ||||
Urban | Ref | Ref | ||
Rural | 0.07 | (−1.04 1.17) | ||
LR chi2(6) | 7.19 | |||
Prob > chi2 | 0.2071 | |||
Pseudo R2 | 0.0207 | |||