Skip to main content

Table 4 Parameter estimates for the complete model

From: Valuing productivity loss due to absenteeism: firm-level evidence from a Canadian linked employer-employee survey

 

Production

P value

Wage

P value

Baseline controlsa

 Log (total no. of employees)

0.94 (0.02)***

<0.001

1.04 (0.01)***

<0.001

 Log (capital)

0.04 (0.01)***

<0.001

0.05 (0.01)***

<0.001

 Attendance rate, non-team workers

0.37 (0.12)***

0.002

0.38 (0.07)***

<0.001

 Attendance rate, team workers

2.78 (1.44)*

0.054

1.83 (0.84)**

0.029

 Team

0.75 (0.17)***

<0.001

0.45 (0.08)***

<0.001

 Difference in attendance coefficients, non-team workers

−0.01 (0.10)

0.876

  

 Difference in attendance coefficients, team workers

0.95 (0.95)

0.318

  

 Difference in team coefficients

0.30 (0.12)**

0.011

  

All controlsb

 Log (total no. of employees)

0.95 (0.02)***

<0.001

1.08 (0.01)***

<0.001

 Log (capital)

0.00 (0.01)

0.935

−0.03 (0.01)***

0.002

 Attendance rate, non-team workers

0.43 (0.13)***

<0.001

0.45 (0.07)***

<0.001

 Attendance rate, team workers

2.38 (1.40)*

0.090

1.43 (0.75)*

0.058

 Team

0.32 (0.12)**

0.012

0.10 (0.05)**

0.041

 Difference in attendance coefficients, non-team workers

−0.02 (0.10)

0.816

  

 Difference in attendance coefficients, team workers

0.95 (1.00)

0.341

  

 Difference in team coefficients

0.21 (0.10)**

0.030

  
  1. aModel adjusted for employment, capital stock, and years
  2. bAdjusted for employment, capital stock, occupation, age, sex, education, race, immigrant, bargaining agreement, international market, foreign owned, region, industry and year; Standard error in the bracket; *** p ≤ 0.01; **0.01 < p ≤ 0.05; *0.05 < p ≤ 0.1