Skip to main content

Table 3 Linear probability models of partnership and mobility (2003–2007)

From: Pay for performance and contractual choice: the case of general practitioners in England

 

Partnership:

Mobility:

 

Model I

Model II

Model I

Age

0.07***

0.05***

-0.06***

 

(0.001)

(0.001)

(0.01)

Age squared

-0.001***

-0.0004***

0.001***

 

(0.00001)

(0.00001)

(0.00005)

Female

-0.06***

-0.12***

0.009***

 

(0.003)

(0.004)

(0.002)

Prop. total QOF points

-

-

-0.0004***

   

(0.0001)

FTE

0.003***

0.001***

0.001***

 

(0.0001)

(0.00004)

(0.0001)

Distance to the best practice

0.0001

-0.00006

-0.00004

 

(0.0001)

(0.00003)

(0.00004)

Total population

0.009

0.002***

-0.002***

 

(0.001)

(0.0004)

(0.0002)

LISI

-0.0003

-0.001***

0.001***

 

(0.0002)

(0.0002)

(0.0002)

Proportion female 65-74

0.01***

0.004**

-0.001

 

(0.003)

(0.002)

(0.002)

Proportion female 75+

0.004

0.002**

-0.003***

 

(0.003)

(0.002)

(0.001)

Proportion male 65-74

-0.001**

-0.0004

0.003

 

(0.003)

(0.002)

(0.002)

Proportion male 75+

-0.01*

-0.0001

0.003*

 

(0.003)

(0.001)

(0.001)

Practice years

0.002***

0.002***

-0.001***

 

(0.0003)

(0.0003)

(0.0002)

Practice size

-0.02***

-0.01***

-0.002***

 

(0.001)

(0.0004)

(0.001)

2004

-0.04***

-0.01***

0.02***

 

(0.002)

(0.001)

(0.003)

2005

-0.06***

-0.01***

0.02***

 

(0.002)

(0.001)

(0.002)

2006

-0.12***

-0.06***

0.03***

 

(0.003)

(0.002)

(0.002)

2007

-0.15

-0.07***

-

 

(0.003)

(0.002)

 

Inverse Mills’ ratio

-

-

-0.04

   

(0.05)

Constant

-1.18***

-0.55***

1.60***

 

(0.03)

(0.02)

(0.02)

N. observations

141,529

141,529

141,529

N. practices

8507

8507

8507

  1. Note: Model I is a pooled linear regression and Model II is a random intercept multilevel model
  2. Model I of Mobility is second stage of Heckman model
  3. p<0.01; p<0.05; p<0.10