Table 6 First-differenced models with exogenous price shock (2005–2006)
From: Pay for performance and contractual choice: the case of general practitioners in England
Model I: bottom quintile | Model II: top quintile | |
|---|---|---|
Change in mobility | Change in mobility | |
Price shock | -0.0003 | -0.0003 |
(0.001) | (0.003) | |
Change of distance to | -0.0001 | 0.0003 |
the best practice | (0.0003) | (0.0002) |
Change in total | -0.03*** | 0.01 |
population | (0.01) | (0.01) |
Change in LISI | 0.004** | -0.003 |
(0.002) | (0.003) | |
Change in proportion | -0.04 | -0.09** |
female 65-74 | (0.03) | (0.04) |
Change in proportion | -0.005 | -0.04 |
female 75+ | (0.03) | (0.04) |
Change in proportion | 0.01 | 0.02 |
male 65-74 | (0.03) | (0.04) |
Change in proportion | 0.01 | 0.16*** |
male 75+ | (0.03) | (0.05) |
Change in practice | -0.01* | -0.00004 |
size | (0.01) | (0.004) |
Inverse Mills’ ratio | 0.45*** | 0.13 |
(0.11) | (0.12) | |
Constant | -0.08*** | -0.04*** |
(0.01) | (0.02) | |
N. observations | 5967 | 5384 |
N. practices | 2282 | 1151 |