Skip to main content

Table 7 Probit models of partnership, mobility and access of new doctors)

From: Pay for performance and contractual choice: the case of general practitioners in England

 

Model I

Model II

Model III

 

Partnership:

Mobility:

Access of

   

new doctors:

Age

1.03***

-0.33***

-0.22***

 

(0.02)

(0.01)

(0.01)

Age squared

-0.01***

0.003***

-

 

(0.0002)

(0.00001)

 

Female

-1.48***

0.03

-0.07

 

(0.04)

(0.02)

(0.04)

Prop. total QOF points

-

-0.01***

-0.001

  

(0.002)

(0.001)

FTE

0.02***

0.003***

-

 

(0.001)

(0.001)

 

Distance to the best practice

0.002*

-0.001

-0.001

 

(0.001)

(0.001)

(0.001)

Total population

0.13***

0.02***

-

 

(0.01)

(0.005)

 

LISI

0.004

0.002

0.01**

 

(0.003)

(0.001)

(0.003)

Proportion female 65-74

0.16***

-0.02

-0.13***

 

(0.05)

(0.02)

(0.05)

Proportion female 75+

0.05*

-0.04***

-0.01

 

(0.03)

(0.01)

(0.03)

Proportion male 65-74

-0.08*

0.05**

0.09*

 

(0.05)

(0.02)

(0.05)

Proportion male 75+

-0.06

0.02

0.03

 

(0.05)

(0.01)

(0.06)

Practice years

0.02***

-0.008***

-0.01**

 

(0.003)

(0.001)

(0.004)

Practice size

-0.23***

-0.06***

0.17***

 

(0.01)

(0.01)

(0.009)

2004

-1.96***

-0.01***

-

 

(0.18)

(0.001)

 

2005

-2.02***

-0.01***

-0.88***

 

(0.18)

(0.001)

(0.03)

2006

-3.00***

-0.06***

-1.65***

 

(0.19)

(0.002)

(0.05)

2007

-3.35

-0.07***

-2.68***

 

(0.19)

(0.002)

(0.07)

Inverse Mills’ ratio

-

5.25***

 
  

(0.62)

 

Constant

-20.64***

6.96***

7.49***

 

(0.03)

(0.25)

(0.21)

N. observations

141,529

126,626

102,325

N. practices

8507

8507

5033

  1. p<0.01; p<0.05; p<0.10