Skip to main content

Table 5 Determinants of occupational cancer costs in Nova Scotia – cost estimate 8

From: Costs of productivity loss due to occupational cancer in Canada: estimation using claims data from Workers’ Compensation Boards

 

Unadjusted

Adjusted full model

Adjusted parsimonious model

Age at biopsy

 <=50

1

1

1

 51–64

4.13%

−21.69%

−21.11%

 65+

−67.08%*

−81.83%***

−79.81%***

Industry

 Government

1

1

1

 Construction

173.74%

173.22%

163.21%

 Manufacturing

−0.32%

6.30%

55.19%

 Other

−71.96%*

−61.38%

−64.75%

Cancer type

 Occupational

1

1

1

 Asbestos

362.61%***

1308.63%***

555.68%***

 Fire Fighter

94.57%

165.25%

140.73%

 Missing

513.98%

619.51%

759.43%

Injury type

 Asbestosis

1

1

 

 Leukemias

158.78%

377.98%

 

 Lymphosarcoma and Reticulosarcoma

−30.25%

96.03%

 

 Neoplasms and Tumors

5.13%

84.67%

 

 Mesothelioma

82.63%

13.10%

 

 Other

201.89%

620.30%**

 

 Unknown

−46.15%

72.77%

 

Region

 Halifax, East shore, West Hants

1

1

 

 Annapolis Valley, South Shore, South West

114.26%

26.59%

 

 Colchester-East Hants, Cumberland, Pictou

−59.90%

−2.97%

 

 Cape Breton, Guysborough, Antigonish

−36.17%

16.88%

 

 Other

−98.58%*

−98.92%**

 

 Missing

−73.96%**

−50.63%

 

Body part affected

 Abdomen/Digestive

1

1

 

 Urinary System

126.23%

126.42%

 

 Body Systems

185.17%

26.36%

 

 Respiratory System

8.94%

2.99%

 

 Circulatory System

−31.00%

−52.84%

 

 Head and Neck

−73.36%

−74.76%

 

 Pelvic Region

−37.69%

−3.41%

 

 Other

−38.65%

−69.28%

 

 Missing

−63.66%

−81.03%

 
  1. Unadjusted and adjusted linear regression models were log transformed. Values shown are exponentiated to estimate the geometric mean, expressed as a percentage of change in total cost compared to the referent
  2. Estimates are adjusted for the national (1957–1978) and Nova Scotia (1979–2015) Consumer Price Index for Health and Personal Care
  3. Inflation was determined using year of biopsy
  4. ***p < 0.01, **p < 0.05, *P < 0.1
  5. N = 304
  6. Total cost: $40 500 000
  7. The bold-face entries are highlighting those results that are statistically significant