Table 4 Observed regressed on predicted utility using OLS and QR
Mapping | OLS | QR (10%) | QR (25%) | QR (50%) | QR (75%) | QR (90%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intercept | Coefficient: predicted value | Intercept | Coefficient: predicted value | Intercept | Coefficient: predicted value | Intercept | Coefficient: predicted value | Intercept | Coefficient: predicted value | Intercept | Coefficient: predicted value | |
Young et al. (2015) [12] | 0.071 | 0.938 | −0.270 | 1.209 | −0.099 | 1.069 | −0.022 | 1.076 | 0.214 | 0.842 | 0.444 | 0.619 |
Khan and Morris (2014) [13] | −1.914 | 2.915 | −1.900 | 3.822 | −1.438 | 3.241 | −1.146 | 2.924 | −0.724 | 2.384 | −0.366 | 1.924 |
Khan et al. (2016) [14] | −1.153 | 4.009 | −2.844 | 5.155 | −2.163 | 4.266 | −2.073 | 4.277 | −1.351 | 3.295 | −0.681 | 2.397 |