Skip to main content

Table 1 General characteristics of micro-costing studies

From: Micro-costing in health and medicine: a critical appraisal

Characteristics

N (%)

Distribution of disease area (based on ICD-9-CM diagnosis chapters)a

 Neoplasms

36 (18.5%)

 Infectious and parasitic diseases

35 (17.9%)

 Diseases of the circulatory system

21 (10.8%)

 Mental disorders

19 (9.7%)

 Diseases of the digestive system

15 (7.7%)

 Endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases, and immunity disorders

14 (7.2%)

 Diseases of the nervous system and sense organs

7 (3.6%)

 Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue

6 (3.1%)

 Diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue

5 (2.6%)

 Injury and poisoning

5 (2.6%)

 Diseases of the genitourinary system

4 (2.1%)

 Congenital anomalies

4 (2.1%)

 Symptoms, signs, and ill-defined conditions

4 (2.1%)

 Supplementary classification of factors influencing health status and contact with health services

4 (2.1%)

 Non-groupable disease/condition

3 (1.5%)

 Diseases of the respiratory system

1 (0.5%)

 Complications of pregnancy, childbirth, and puerperium

1 (0.5%)

 Supplementary classification of external causes of injury and poisoning

1 (0.5%)

 No specific disease/condition

23 (11.8%)

Distribution of study geographic locationa

 USA

72 (36.9%)

 Europe

68 (34.9%)

 Asia

23 (11.8%)

 Africa

19 (9.7%)

 Australia/New Zealand/Micronesia

6 (3.1%)

 Canada

6 (3.1%)

 Latin America/Caribbean (including Mexico)

2 (1.0%)

Type of study designa

 Observational study

131 (67.2%)

 Randomized controlled trial

64 (32.8%)

 Decision analytic modeling

4 (2.1%)

 Other economic modeling

2 (1.0%)

 Other study design

2 (1.0%)

Type of economic evaluationa

 Cost effectiveness analysis

47 (24.1%)

 Cost utility analysis

11 (5.6%)

 Cost minimization analysis

11 (5.6%)

 Cost benefit analysis

3 (1.5%)

 Cost consequence analysis

12 (6.2%)

 Cost comparison analysis (without evaluation of effectiveness)

37 (19.0%)

 Single intervention cost analysis (without evaluation of effectiveness)

45 (23.1%)

 Single intervention cost analysis (with evaluation of effectiveness)

16 (8.2%)

 Cost of illness analysis

21 (10.8%)

 Other economic evaluation

1 (0.5%)

Economic evaluation perspective specified

 Yes

129 (66.2%)

 No

66 (33.8%)

Actual economic evaluation perspective useda

 Hospital/clinic/provider

111 (56.9%)

 Societal

40 (20.5%)

 Health care program

21 (10.8%)

 Health care system

17 (8.7%)

 Insurer

9 (4.6%)

 Employer

2 (1.0%)

 Other

15 (7.7%)

Price year specified

 Yes

131 (67.2%)

 No

64 (32.8%)

Currency specified

 Yes

194 (99.5%)

 No

1 (0.5%)

Inflation adjustment

 Yes

83 (42.6%)

 No

7 (3.6%)

 Not specified

86 (44.1%)

 Not applicable

19 (9.7%)

Sensitivity analysisa

 Deterministic sensitivity analysis

90 (46.2%)

 Stochastic (probabilistic) sensitivity analysis

13 (6.7%)

 Other sensitivity analysis

6 (3.1%)

 No sensitivity analysis

94 (48.2%)

Funding supporta

 Government funding source

79 (40.5%)

 Non-profit non-government funding source

47 (24.1%)

 Industry sponsored study

28 (14.4%)

 No funding

15 (7.7%)

 Not specified

55 (28.2%)

Conflict of interest

 Yes

12 (6.2%)

 No

76 (39.0%)

 Not specified

107 (54.9%)

  1. Percentages may not add to 100 due to rounding
  2. a A study may fall into more than one of the listed categories