Practices of decision making in priority setting and resource allocation: a scoping review and narrative synthesis of existing frameworks

Seixas, Brayan V.; Dionne, François; Mitton, Craig

doi:10.1186/s13561-020-00300-0

Table 1 Practices of priority setting found in the literature

From: Practices of decision making in priority setting and resource allocation: a scoping review and narrative synthesis of existing frameworks

Authors	Date	Country	Level of exercise	Area of application	Primary decision maker	Classification category
Peacock et al. [19]	2007	Australia	Regional	Mental health services	Executive team	PBMA framework
Galego et al. [20]	2007	Australia	Hospital	Drugs	Executive team	Multi-criteria value assessment framework
McDonald et al. [21]	2011	Australia	Regional	Primary care services	Executive team	Multi-criteria value assessment framework
Mentzaskis et al. [22]	2014	Austria	National	General health services	Policy makers	Multi-criteria value assessment framework (specifically, DCE)
Urquhart et al. [23]	2008	Canada	Regional	Home and community care	Executive team	PBMA framework + A4R
Dionne et al. [24]	2009	Canada	Regional	General health services	Executive team	PBMA framework
Stafinski et al. [25]	2011	Canada	National	Health technologies	Policy makers	HTA-related framework
Mitton et al. [26]	2011	Canada	Regional	Primary care, community care and public health	Executive team	PBMA framework
Cornelissen et al. [27]	2016	Canada	Regional	Community care	Executive team	PBMA framework
Greenberg et al. [28]	2009	Israel	National	Health technologies	Policy makers	HTA-related framework
Ahn et al. [29]	2012	Korea	National	Health technologies	Policy makers	HTA-related framework
Choe et al. [30]	2014	Korea	National	Vaccines	Policy makers	Multi-criteria value assessment framework
Ashton et al. [31]	2008	New Zealand	Regional	General health services	Executive team	Multi-criteria value assessment framework
Defechereux et al. [32]	2012	Norway	National	General health services	Policy makers	Multi-criteria value assessment framework
Waldau et al. [33]	2010	Sweden	Regional	General health services	Executive team	Multi-criteria value assessment framework + A4R
Waldau et al. [34]	2015	Sweden	Regional	General health services	Executive team	Multi-criteria value assessment framework + A4R
Bate et al. [35]	2007	UK	Regional	Orthopedic surgery	Executive team	PBMA framework
Wilson et al. [36]	2007	UK	Regional	General health services	Executive team	PBMA framework
Airoldi et al. [37]	2008	UK	National	Diabetes	Policy makers	Multi-criteria value assessment framework
Marsh et al. [38]	2013	UK	National	Preventative health interventions	Policy makers	Multi-criteria value assessment framework
Goodwin et al. [39]	2013	UK	Regional	General health services	Executive team	PBMA
Airoldi et al. [40]	2013	UK	Regional	Mental health services	Executive team	Multi-criteria value assessment framework
Holmes et al. [41]	2018	UK	Regional	Dental services	Executive team	PBMA
Vernazza et al. [42]	2019	UK	Regional	Dental services	Executive team	Multi-criteria value assessment framework
Canham-Chervak et al. [43]	2010	US	National	Military injuries	Executive team	Multi-criteria value assessment framework

Back to article page

ISSN: 2191-1991

Contact us

Submission enquiries: camille.lumabas@springernature.com
General enquiries: info@biomedcentral.com

Health Economics Review

Contact us