Skip to main content

Table 1 Study and surgical procedure characteristics (n = 85)

From: The use of micro-costing in economic analyses of surgical interventions: a systematic review

 

n (%)

Year of publication

 Pre 2000

4 (4.7)

 2001–2005

5 (5.9)

 2006–2010

11 (12.9)

 2011–2015

31 (36.5)

 2016–2018

34 (40.0)

Study design

 Within/as part of RCT

5 (5.9)

 Observational comparative study

42 (49.4)

 Case/control study

4 (4.7)

 Case-series

21 (24.7)

 Other

13 (15.3)

Data collection

 Prospective

27 (31.8)

 Retrospective

40 (47.1)

 Combination of prospective and retrospective

4 (4.7)

 Not clear/not stated

14 (16.5)

Type of economic analysis reported by study authors

 Cost analysis

54 (63.5)

 Micro-costing/activity-based costing

13 (15.3)

 Cost-effectiveness analysis

6 (7.1)

 Economic analysis

4 (4.7)

 Cost Consequence Analysis

3 (3.5)

 Cost-utility analysis

1 (1.2)

 Other

4 (4.7)

Country of origin

 Europe

41 (48.2)

 USA

21 (24.7)

 UK

7 (8.2)

 Canada

4 (4.7)

 Other

6 (7.1)

 Multinational

6 (7.1)

Number of participating centres

 Single centre

66 (77.6)

 Multicentre

16 (18.8)

 Not clear/not stated

3 (3.5)

Number of patients/procedures micro-costed (median, interquartile range, range)

100 (24–233) (6–2130)

Surgical speciality

 Orthopaedics

22 (25.9)

 General surgery

14 (16.5)

 Plastic surgery

9 (10.6)

 Obstetrics and gynaecology

8 (9.4)

 ENT

7 (8.2)

 Maxillofacial surgery

5 (5.9)

 Cardiothoracic surgery

5 (5.9)

 Urology

3 (3.5)

 Neurosurgery

2 (2.4)

 Vascular surgery

1 (1.2)

 Other

4 (4.7)

Surgical procedure involving an implant

25 (29.4)

Type of anaesthesia used

 General anaesthesia only

39 (46.4)

 Local anaesthesia only

4 (4.8)

 Both local and general anaesthesia

5 (6.0)

 Not stated/not clear

36 (42.9)

Type of hospital stay

 Day-case procedures

13 (15.3)

 Inpatient procedures

43 (50.6)

 Both day-case and inpatient procedures

11 (12.9)

 Not stated/not clear

18 (21.2)