Skip to main content

Table 1 Overview of the five economic evaluations reviewed by study characteristics and outcomes with all costs in 2018 US

From: Economic evaluation of HIV testing options for low-prevalence high-income countries: a systematic review

Authors

Country

Setting

Perspective

Analysis type

Study design (follow up)

Time horizon

Population

Interventions

Outcomes

Cipriano LE et al., 2012 [44]

United States

US Urban center

Societala

Cost-utility

Deterministic dynamic compartmental model

20 years

IDU’s and non-IDU’s in opioid replacement therapy

One-time and repeat interval screening

ICER; Costs per life year; $36,081 per QALY versus one-time screening

Sanders GD et al., 2010 [46]

United States

US

Perfect insurerb

Cost-effectiveness

Markov model

Lifetime

Emergency department

Model A: traditional HIV counseling and testing; Model B: nurse-initiated routine screening with traditional HIV testing and counseling; Model C: nurse-initiated routine screening with rapid HIV testing and streamlined counseling

Cost per QALY vs Model A:

Model B: Extended dominance

Model C: $ 42,769 /QALY;

Cost per life year (LY) vs Model A

Model B: Extended dominance

Model C: $ 31,392.35 /LY

Dowdy DW et al., 2011 [45]

United States

Emergency departments

Societala

Cost-effectiveness

Decision analysis

Lifetime

Persons at higher risk of HIV

Targeted ED HIV screening versus clinic-based approaches

$ 96,727.44 for targeted screening program; $ 53.51 per screening test; $ 90,498.34 /QALY for targeted HIV screening versus clinic-based approaches

Paltiel A D et al., 2005 [47]

United States

USA

Societala

Cost-utility

Model-based evaluation: Monte Carlo, state-transition framework

Lifetime

High risk, CDC threshold and US general cohort

Routine voluntary HIVCTR; Testing at presentation with opportunistic infections

High risk population: One-time ELISA versus current practice: $ 51,283.93 /QALY, More frequent screening >$50,000/QALY

In the general population: all screening regiments are >$50,000/QALY

Walensky R P et al., 2005 [48, 49]

United States

Hypothetical cohort of 100 million US inpatients

Societala

Cost-utility

State-transition simulation model

Lifetime

Hypothetical cohort of 100 million US inpatients

HIV screening based on HIV prevalence

Screening versus no screening, $ 50,429.20 /QALY in settings with 1% HIV prevalence; $ 91,171.44 in settings with 0.1% HIV prevalence

  1. aSocietal perspective refers to consideration of all foreseeable benefits/effects (positive and negative outcomes) including those outside of the healthcare system
  2. bThe perfect insurer refers to considerations of costs to the insurer and patient, and corresponds to what most studies term a societal perspective