Authors | Country | Setting | Perspective | Analysis type | Study design (follow up) | Time horizon | Population | Interventions | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cipriano LE et al., 2012 [44] | United States | US Urban center | Societala | Cost-utility | Deterministic dynamic compartmental model | 20 years | IDU’s and non-IDU’s in opioid replacement therapy | One-time and repeat interval screening | ICER; Costs per life year; $36,081 per QALY versus one-time screening |
Sanders GD et al., 2010 [46] | United States | US | Perfect insurerb | Cost-effectiveness | Markov model | Lifetime | Emergency department | Model A: traditional HIV counseling and testing; Model B: nurse-initiated routine screening with traditional HIV testing and counseling; Model C: nurse-initiated routine screening with rapid HIV testing and streamlined counseling | Cost per QALY vs Model A: Model B: Extended dominance Model C: $ 42,769 /QALY; Cost per life year (LY) vs Model A Model B: Extended dominance Model C: $ 31,392.35 /LY |
Dowdy DW et al., 2011 [45] | United States | Emergency departments | Societala | Cost-effectiveness | Decision analysis | Lifetime | Persons at higher risk of HIV | Targeted ED HIV screening versus clinic-based approaches | $ 96,727.44 for targeted screening program; $ 53.51 per screening test; $ 90,498.34 /QALY for targeted HIV screening versus clinic-based approaches |
Paltiel A D et al., 2005 [47] | United States | USA | Societala | Cost-utility | Model-based evaluation: Monte Carlo, state-transition framework | Lifetime | High risk, CDC threshold and US general cohort | Routine voluntary HIVCTR; Testing at presentation with opportunistic infections | High risk population: One-time ELISA versus current practice: $ 51,283.93 /QALY, More frequent screening >$50,000/QALY In the general population: all screening regiments are >$50,000/QALY |
United States | Hypothetical cohort of 100 million US inpatients | Societala | Cost-utility | State-transition simulation model | Lifetime | Hypothetical cohort of 100 million US inpatients | HIV screening based on HIV prevalence | Screening versus no screening, $ 50,429.20 /QALY in settings with 1% HIV prevalence; $ 91,171.44 in settings with 0.1% HIV prevalence |