Drummond criteria | Cipriano LE et al., 2012 [44] | Sanders GD et al., 2010 [46] | Dowdy DW et al., 2011 [45] | Paltiel AD et al., 2005 [47] | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Well-defined question? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Can’t tell | Can’t tell |
Adequate description of comparators? | Yes | Yes | Can’t tell | Can’t tell | Can’t tell |
Evidence of effectiveness? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Relevant costs/consequences? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Can’t tell | Can’t tell |
Costs/consequences accurately measured? | No | No | Can’t tell | Can’t tell | Can’t tell |
Were the valuation costs/consequences credible? | Yes | Can’t tell | Can’t tell | Can’t tell | Can’t tell |
Was discounting used as appropriate? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Were incremental analyses appropriately reported? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Were sensitivity analyses reported? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Was the discussion adequate? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Percent of criteria met | 90% | 80% | 70% | 50% | 50% |