Skip to main content

Table 2 Deterministic sensitivity analyses

From: Adjuvant treatment of high-risk melanoma – cost-effectiveness analysis of treatment options for BRAF 600 mutated tumors

 

Costs (T€)

Effectiveness (QALY)

ICER

dabrafenib/ trametinib

observation

dabrafenib/ trametinib

observation

 

Base Case results

 

155.1

69.0

10.41

8.14

37.800

Deterministic sensitivity analyses related to general model setup

 Costs and effectiveness undiscounted

Base case: 3%

165.3

83.0

15.48

11.69

21.677

 Model horizon 10 years

Base case: Lifetime

149.1

58.6

5,74

4.87

104.092

 Mortality rates converge to general population after 40 years

Base case: convergence after 8–10 years

149.2

59.9

11.62

9.06

34.865

 Survival curves shifted downwards: hazard ratios for RFS/DMFS/OS 10% higher

Base case: HR = 1. published curves

157.1

71.6

9.82

7.48

37.751

 Survival curves shifted upwards: hazard rates for RFS/DMFS/OS 10% lower

Base case: HR = 1. published curves

152.8

65.9

11.07

8.82

38.576

Deterministic sensitivity analyses related transition probabilities with high uncertainty

 Split locoregional vs. DM when progressing from relapse free state: 80% DM, 20% LR

Base case: 33% LR. 67% DM

164.0

78.1

10.35

8.07

37.658

 Split locoregional vs. DM when progressing from relapse free state: 40% DM, 60% LR

Base case: 33% LR. 67% DM

139.0

51.5

10.56

8.27

38.111

 Transition probability from locoregional state to DM not increased compared to progression from RFS state to DM

Base case: Transition prob. increased by hazard ratio 1.5

151.6

63.8

10.44

8.18

38.787

 Mortality in locoregional state not decreased compared to distant metastasis state

Base case: Mortality decreased by hazard ratio 0.35

167.4

81.0

10.31

8,03

37.787

  1. QALY Quality adjusted life years, ICER Incremental cost effectiveness ratio, HR Hazard ratio RFS Relapse-free survival, DMFS Distant metastasis free survival, OS Overall survival, LR locoregional state, DM distant metastasis state