Skip to main content

Table 2 Marginal effects for the binary logistic regression model performed for the catastrophic measure. Pre-transplant or first phase

From: Sociodemographic and health factors associated with the risk of financial catastrophe when informal care for patients with haematological neoplasms is replaced by formal care

 

dy/dx

SD

P-value

Male (Ref. Female)

 

1.69%

0.063

0.788

Age (Ref. Age < 35)

35–44

−22.17%

0.101

0.029**

45–54

−4.30%

0.109

0.694

> 55

2.77%

0.115

0.810

Marital Status (Ref. Married)

Single

8.45%

0.085

0.322

Widow

−44.77%

0.125

0,000***

Separated/Divorced

14.67%

0.141

0.298

Educational level (Ref. Low level: primary school incomplete, primary or equivalent)

Middle level: secondary school/middle level profesional

−16.76%

0.085

0,048**

High level: University degree or equivalent

−21.95%

0.072

0.000***

Activity Status (Ref. Employed (employed for others, autonomous))

Unemployed

−13.48%

0.109

0.216

Receiving earnings-related pension

13.39%

0.121

0.072*

Other situations (Housework, student, other)

6.71%

0.103

0.513

Diagnosis (Ref. Acute Leukaemia)

Hodgkin Lymphoma/Non Hodgkin Lymphoma

−10.48%

0.109

0.314

Multiple Myeloma

−27.85%

0.119

0.014**

Other

−33.23%

0.132

0,006***

Self-perceived health status (Ref. Very bad/bad/regular self-perceived health status)

Good/very good self-perceived health status

−21.50%

0.074

0,004***

N

123

LR χ2 (H0: β1 = β2 = … = βk)

36.80

Prob > χ2

0.000

Pseudo R2

0.390

Classification table

89.17%

  1. dy/dx: Marginal effect. Includes the slope of the calculated parameter
  2. SD Standard deviation
  3. p-value: Corresponds to the test of individual significance of the corresponding parameter
  4. LR: Corresponds to the test of overall significance of all the slopes in the model
  5. *** Denotes significance at the level of p < 0.01; ** denotes significance at the level of p < 0.05; * denotes significance at the level of p < 0.10