Skip to main content

Table 3 Marginal effects for the binary logistic regression model performed for the catastrophic measure. First year post-transplant or second phase

From: Sociodemographic and health factors associated with the risk of financial catastrophe when informal care for patients with haematological neoplasms is replaced by formal care

 

dy/dx

SD

P-value

Male (Ref. Female)

 

−11.52%

0,067

0,086*

Age (Ref. Age < 35)

35–44

−4.16%

0.098

0.672

45–54

−3.43%

0.103

0.738

> 55

−2.48%

0,103

0.809

Marital Status (Ref. Married)

Single

11.52%

0.089

0.192

Widow

−23.00%

0.159

0.148

Separated/Divorced

−5.89%

0.102

0.568

Educational level (Ref. Low level: primary school incomplete, primary or equivalent)

Middle level: secondary school/middle level profesional

−13.57%

0.083

0.102

High level: University degree or equivalent

−20.39%

0.078

0.009***

Activity Status (Ref. Employed (employed for others, autonomous))

Unemployed

−8.12%

0.106

0.442

Receiving earnings-related pension

4.66%

0.075

0.533

Other situations (Housework, student, other)

−3.31%

0.102

0.745

Diagnosis (Ref. Acute Leukaemia)

Hodgkin Lymphoma/Non Hodgkin Lymphoma

15.07%

0.082

0.066*

Multiple Myeloma

−1.15%

0.082

0.888

Other

−7.49%

0,095

0.428

Self-perceived health status (Ref. Very bad/bad/regular self-perceived health status)

Good/very good self-perceived health status

−24.55%

0,062

0,000***

N

123

LR χ2 (H0: β1 = β2 = … = βk)

32.51

Prob > χ2

0.000

Pseudo R2

0.275

Classification table

88.49%

  1. dy/dx: Marginal effect. Includes the slope of the calculated parameter
  2. SD Standard deviation
  3. p-value: Corresponds to the test of individual significance of the corresponding parameter
  4. LR: Corresponds to the test of overall significance of all the slopes in the model
  5. *** Denotes significance at the level of p < 0.01; ** denotes significance at the level of p < 0.05; * denotes significance at the level of p < 0.10