Skip to main content

Table 4 Marginal effects for the binary logistic regression model performed for the catastrophic measure. Second-sixth year post-transplant or third phase

From: Sociodemographic and health factors associated with the risk of financial catastrophe when informal care for patients with haematological neoplasms is replaced by formal care

 

dy/dx

SD

P-value

Male (Ref. Female)

 

2.54%

0,080

0.751

Age (Ref. Age < 35)

35–44

4.75%

0.137

0.729

45–54

14.98%

0.126

0.234

> 55

15.39%

0.136

0.258

Marital Status (Ref. Married)

Single

18.10%

0.108

0.092*

Widow

−11.50%

0.249

0.644

Separated/Divorced

−13.19%

0.174

0.449

Educational level (Ref. Low level: primary school incomplete, primary or equivalent)

Middle level: secondary school/middle level profesional

−12.03%

0.097

0.216

High level: University degree or equivalent

−8.59%

0.105

0.413

Activity Status (Ref. Employed (employed for others, autonomous))

Unemployed

14.05%

0.148

0.343

Receiving earnings-related pension

10.04%

0.106

0.925

Other situations (Housework, student, other)

4.82%

0.136

0.723

Diagnosis (Ref. Acute Leukaemia)

Hodgkin Lymphoma/Non Hodgkin Lymphoma

15.32%

0.101

0.127

Multiple Myeloma

23.39%

0.110

0,003**

Other

0.90%

0.137

0.948

Self-perceived health status (Ref. Very bad/bad/regular self-perceived health status)

Good/very good self-perceived health status

−42.18%

0.081

0,000***

N

123

LR χ2 (H0: β1 = β2 = … = βk)

40.67

Prob > χ2

0.000

Pseudo R2

0.214

Classification table

74.82%

  1. dy/dx: Marginal effect. Includes the slope of the calculated parameter
  2. SD Standard deviation
  3. p-value: Corresponds to the test of individual significance of the corresponding parameter
  4. LR: Corresponds to the test of overall significance of all the slopes in the model
  5. *** Denotes significance at the level of p < 0.01; ** denotes significance at the level of p < 0.05; * denotes significance at the level of p < 0.10