Skip to main content

Table 1 Identified key domains to address the challenge of processes

From: Shaping a research agenda to ensure a successful European health technology assessment: insights generated during the inaugural convention of the European Access Academy

Process Challenges

Key Domains

Address challenge of multiple PICOs

Time and capacity challenges

Integrating all involved stakeholders

Conflicts and aligning

Interaction with health technology developer

Description

PICO is the basis for both the advice as well as the assessment. Early discussion of PICO and agreement across regulatory and HTA stakeholders is critical to design a clinical development program

Ensure sufficient capacities to allow for early and inclusive collaboration e.g., sufficient joint early advice opportunities and to allow sufficient time for submission, generation and publication of the assessment report so national processes are not impacted

EU HTA will shape future oncology care across Europe. Early and inclusive involvement of all stakeholders (patients, HTA bodies, regulators, clinicians, industry) is key to ensure success of the regulation

Overcoming current multiplicity and/or duplication of national HTA procedures is at the heart of the EU HTA regulation. Resolution of divergences between national and EU HTA bodies and between the various other stakeholders is key

Early and inclusive collaboration between clinicians, patients, regulators, HTA bodies and the industry to ensure that the developed medicines are addressing an unmet medical need

Guiding Questions

What is the rationale for different PICOs?

Are there options to decrease fragmentation of PICOs?

How can the challenge of a PICO changing from advice to assessment be addressed?

What is the expected number of new oncology drug applications / year and the related joint scientific advice capabilities of EMA/ EU HTA?

What can be done to increase the number of available joint scientific advice slots?

How are the various stakeholders involved throughout a medicine’s HTA process?

How will their input be used and where can it help improve the quality and usability of the assessment?

How to ensure a strong clinical input?

How to ensure national HTA bodies incorporate the JCA into their process, improving the quality of decision-making and enabling timely patient access?

How to resolve or contextualise different recommendations of regulators vs HTA bodies?

What are benefits of early and inclusive collaboration with the HTD in delivering the objectives of the Regulation?

At what stages and frequency should this engagement occur?