Skip to main content

Table 3 Heterogeneity by the presence of an older household member: Determinants of catastrophic health expenditure

From: Universal health coverage in the context of population ageing: catastrophic health expenditure and unmet need for healthcare

CHE10

With 64 y/o<

With 65 y/o+

Income

-0.01*

-0.01

 

(0.00)

(0.01)

Savings

0.00

0.00

 

(0.00)

(0.00)

Age of household head

-0.01**

-0.01

 

(0.00)

(0.01)

Age of household head2

0.00**

0.00

 

(0.00)

(0.00)

Household head being university graduate or higher

0.03

-0.04

 

(0.02)

(0.03)

Household head being in paid work

-0.04**

-0.04**

 

(0.01)

(0.01)

House ownership

0.03**

0.08#

 

(0.01)

(0.05)

Household size

-0.01

0.02

 

(0.01)

(0.02)

Individual-FE

Yes

Yes

City-by-Year-FE

Yes

Yes

Constant

0.47**

0.52

 

(0.12)

(0.34)

Individuals

6,113

3,059

Observations

44,347

19,031

  1. Note: CHE10 denotes catastrophic health expenditure at a 10% threshold; Estimates by fixed-effects linear probability models, classifying the sample by the presence/absence of at least one household member aged 65 or older; ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, # p < 0.10; Values are coefficients with cluster-robust standard errors in parentheses; Income and savings are equivalised by household size and transformed by the inverse hyperbolic sine transformation; Household size represents the log transformed number of household members; FE represents fixed-effects; Weighted by longitudinal weights to address for attrition bias; singleton observations are not used for estimations; As a result of estimating multiple models to assess non-linear relationships between age of household head and the experienced CHE10, the quadratic relationship was observed whilst the cubic term of age was not significant.