Table 3 Quality rating
From: Impact of reimbursement systems on patient care – a systematic review of systematic reviews
Review | AMSTAR-2 Score | Quality rating | Risk of bias rating | Reimbursement system |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Agarwal et al. | 7 of 13 | moderate | moderate | BPa |
Ahmed et al. | 4 of 13 | low | high | VBPb |
Barouni et al. | 5 of 13 | low | high | BP |
Benabbas et al. | 7 of 13 | moderate | moderate | VBP |
Bernstein et al. | 10 of 13 | high | low | BP |
Brocklehurst et al. | 10 of 13 | high | low | BP, FFSc |
Brown et al. | 8 of 13 | moderate | moderate | BP, FFS, VBP |
Carter et al. | 9 of 13 | high | low | BP, FFS, VBP |
Cattel et al. | 6 of 13 | moderate | moderate | BP |
de Bruin et al. | 3 of 13 | low | high | VBP |
de Vries et al. | 7 of 13 | moderate | moderate | BP, FFS, VBP |
Eijkenaar et al. | 7 of 13 | moderate | moderate | VBP |
Emmert et al. | 7 of 13 | moderate | moderate | VBP |
Feldhaus et al. | 3 of 13 | low | high | BP, FFS, VBP |
Forbes et al. | 10 of 13 | high | low | VBP |
Gillam et al. | 4 of 13 | low | high | VBP |
Gupta et al. | 12 of 13 | high | low | VBP |
Heider et al. | 8 of 13 | moderate | moderate | Salary, BP, FFS, VBP |
Herbst et al. | 4 of 13 | low | high | VBP |
Huang et al. | 12 of 16 | high | low | VBP |
Jia et al. | 14 of 16 | high | low | FFS, VBP |
Kim et al. | 8 of 13 | moderate | moderate | VBP |
Kondo et al. | 7 of 13 | moderate | moderate | VBP |
Langdown et al. | 4 of 13 | low | high | VBP |
Lee et al. | 6 of 13 | moderate | moderate | VBP |
Markovitz et al. | 3 of 13 | low | high | VBP |
Martin et al. | 6 of 13 | moderate | moderate | VBP |
Mathes et al. | 12 of 13 | high | low | VBP |
Mauro et al. | 8 of 13 | moderate | moderate | VBP |
Mendelson et al. | 9 of 13 | high | low | VBP |
Mitchell et al. | 8 of 13 | moderate | moderate | VBP |
Palmer et al. | 10 of 16 | moderate | moderate | BP |
Quinn et al. | 10 of 13 | high | low | Salary, BP, FFS |
Vlaanderen et al. | 7 of 13 | moderate | moderate | VBP |